Globalisation and trade restrictions
Globalisation: Definition and Causes
Globalisation is not a single event but a process driven by specific factors. Understanding these causes helps explain why international trade has expanded significantly in recent decades.
Building on the definition: Globalisation is not just about trade; it also involves the flow of capital and ideas. However, for this topic, we focus heavily on the economic aspects: trade flows and MNC activity.
Globalisation
Globalisation is the increasing integration and interdependence of the world's economies, cultures, and populations. It is driven by cross-border trade in goods and services, technology, and flows of investment, people, and information.
Causes of Changes in Globalisation
The expansion of globalisation is primarily driven by four key factors:
| Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Reduction in Trade Restrictions | Governments have lowered tariffs and removed quotas through agreements like the WTO. This makes it easier and cheaper to trade across borders. |
| Lower Transport Costs | Improvements in shipping (containerisation) and aviation have drastically reduced the cost of moving goods, making international trade more profitable. |
| Lower Communication Costs | The internet and digital technology allow instant communication and coordination of global supply chains, reducing transaction costs for businesses. |
| Movement of Multinational Companies (MNCs) | MNCs establish operations in multiple countries to access cheaper labour, new markets, or resources, directly linking economies together. |
Effects of Globalisation
Globalisation has profound effects on various economic and social variables. These effects are often mixed, creating winners and losers.
| Area | Positive Effects | Negative Effects |
|---|---|---|
| International Trade | Increased volume of trade; countries specialise according to comparative advantage. | Over-reliance on imports for essential goods (e.g., food security risks). |
| Competition | Consumers benefit from lower prices and greater variety. Firms are forced to innovate. | Domestic firms may be driven out of business if they cannot compete with efficient foreign producers. |
| Income Distribution | Wealth is generated in developing countries, lifting people out of poverty. | In developed countries, low-skilled workers may face wage stagnation or job losses due to offshoring. Inequality may increase within countries. |
| Economic Development | MNC investment brings capital and technology to developing nations (host countries). | Profits may be repatriated to home countries rather than reinvested locally. Resource depletion in host countries. |
| Environment | Transfer of green technology to developing nations. | Increased transport emissions. 'Race to the bottom' where MNCs locate in countries with weak environmental regulations. |
| Migration | Labour mobility allows workers to move to areas with higher wages. | Brain drain (skilled workers leaving developing countries). Social tensions in host countries. |
Multinational Companies (MNCs)
MNCs are firms that operate in more than one country. They have a headquarters in the home country and production/sales offices in host countries.
| Stakeholder | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Host Country (where factory is) |
|
|
| Home Country (HQ location) |
|
|
Evaluating MNC Impact
When to use: When asked to 'evaluate' or 'discuss' the impact of MNCs on a host country.
Why examiners accept this: Examiners look for balanced analysis. Do not just list pros and cons. You must weigh them. For example, acknowledge that while MNCs create jobs, they may also suppress wages if there is no unionisation.
Example phrase: 'While the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) boosts GDP in the short term, the long-term benefit depends on whether technology transfer occurs and if profits are reinvested locally rather than repatriated.'
Why examiners accept this: Examiners look for balanced analysis. Do not just list pros and cons. You must weigh them. For example, acknowledge that while MNCs create jobs, they may also suppress wages if there is no unionisation.
Example phrase: 'While the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) boosts GDP in the short term, the long-term benefit depends on whether technology transfer occurs and if profits are reinvested locally rather than repatriated.'
Trade Restrictions: Types and Reasons
Governments often intervene in free trade using protectionist policies. These are known as trade restrictions or protectionism.
Types of Trade Restrictions
| Type of Restriction | Definition and Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Tariff | A tax imposed on imported goods. This raises the price of imports, making domestic goods relatively cheaper. It also generates tax revenue for the government. |
| Import Quota | A physical limit on the quantity of a specific good that can be imported. This restricts supply, driving up the price of the imported good. |
| Subsidy | A payment from the government to domestic producers. This lowers their costs, allowing them to sell at lower prices or compete more effectively against imports. |
| Embargo | A complete ban on trade with a specific country or on a specific good. It is the most severe form of restriction. |
⚠︎ Confusing Quotas and Tariffs
Common Error: Students often think that reducing an import quota increases expenditure on imports.
Correct Understanding: Reducing a quota means allowing fewer imports. This restricts supply and typically leads to higher prices for the remaining imported goods, but the total quantity traded decreases. Conversely, removing a tariff lowers the price, which may increase the quantity demanded.
Correct Understanding: Reducing a quota means allowing fewer imports. This restricts supply and typically leads to higher prices for the remaining imported goods, but the total quantity traded decreases. Conversely, removing a tariff lowers the price, which may increase the quantity demanded.
Reasons for Trade Restrictions
Governments justify protectionism using several arguments:
| Reason | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Protect Infant Industries | New industries in developing countries need protection from established foreign competitors until they can achieve economies of scale and become competitive. |
| Protect Declining Industries | To prevent sudden job losses and social unrest in sectors that are no longer competitive globally (e.g., traditional manufacturing). |
| Protect Strategic Industries | To ensure self-sufficiency in essential goods like food, energy, or defence equipment, so the country is not dependent on foreign suppliers during a crisis. |
| Avoid Dumping | To protect domestic firms from dumping, where MNCs sell goods below cost to drive competitors out of the market and gain monopoly power. |
| Reduce Current Account Deficit | By restricting imports, a country can reduce its import bill, improving the balance of payments (current account). |
| Raise Tax Revenue | Tariffs provide a source of government revenue, which is particularly useful in developing countries with weak domestic tax collection systems. |
| Restrict Import of Demerit Goods | Governments use tariffs or quotas to raise the price of goods with negative externalities (e.g., tobacco, alcohol) to reduce consumption and correct market failure. |
| Promote Environmental Sustainability | To prevent 'pollution havens' where MNCs might exploit weak environmental laws in host countries. Restrictions can ensure higher environmental standards are met. |
Explaining Infant Industry Protection
When to use: When asked to explain the rationale behind protecting new industries.
Why examiners accept this: You must link protection to long-term competitiveness. Simply saying 'to help them' is insufficient. You need to mention economies of scale or learning curves.
Example phrase: 'Protecting infant industries allows them to build capacity and achieve economies of scale, which lowers their long-run average costs, enabling them to compete with established foreign rivals in the future.'
Why examiners accept this: You must link protection to long-term competitiveness. Simply saying 'to help them' is insufficient. You need to mention economies of scale or learning curves.
Example phrase: 'Protecting infant industries allows them to build capacity and achieve economies of scale, which lowers their long-run average costs, enabling them to compete with established foreign rivals in the future.'
Consequences of Trade Restrictions
While protectionism has political and strategic benefits, it creates economic inefficiencies.
| Aspect | Impact |
|---|---|
| Deadweight Loss (Allocative Inefficiency) | Tariffs and quotas create deadweight loss. This occurs because: 1. Production Distortion: Domestic production shifts from efficient foreign producers to less efficient domestic producers. 2. Consumption Distortion: Higher prices reduce consumption below the optimal level, meaning mutually beneficial trades do not occur. |
| Impact on Home Country |
|
| Impact on Trading Partners |
|
| Advantages of Free Trade (vs. Restrictions) | Free trade allows countries to specialise according to comparative advantage, leading to lower prices, greater variety for consumers, and more efficient global resource allocation. |
Past Paper Style Questions
Q:
Discuss whether or not imposing tariffs on imports will increase a country’s output. [8]
A:
Arguments for:
- Tariffs raise the price of imports, reducing demand for foreign goods.
- Consumers switch to domestically produced substitutes (import substitution).
- Net exports (X-M) increase, raising Aggregate Demand (AD).
- Higher AD encourages firms to increase output and employment in the short run.
Arguments against:
- If domestic industries are inefficient, they may not be able to meet the increased demand, leading to shortages.
- Tariffs on raw materials increase costs for downstream industries, reducing their competitiveness.
- Retaliation from trading partners may reduce exports, offsetting gains in output.
Conclusion: Output may rise temporarily if the economy has spare capacity, but long-term efficiency is reduced due to protection of uncompetitive firms.
- Tariffs raise the price of imports, reducing demand for foreign goods.
- Consumers switch to domestically produced substitutes (import substitution).
- Net exports (X-M) increase, raising Aggregate Demand (AD).
- Higher AD encourages firms to increase output and employment in the short run.
Arguments against:
- If domestic industries are inefficient, they may not be able to meet the increased demand, leading to shortages.
- Tariffs on raw materials increase costs for downstream industries, reducing their competitiveness.
- Retaliation from trading partners may reduce exports, offsetting gains in output.
Conclusion: Output may rise temporarily if the economy has spare capacity, but long-term efficiency is reduced due to protection of uncompetitive firms.
Q:
Analyse how a government subsidy could help protect an infant industry against foreign competition. [6]
A:
- A subsidy is a payment from the government to domestic producers.
- It lowers the firm's average costs of production.
- This allows the firm to sell at a lower price than foreign competitors, or reinvest the savings into technology and skilled labour.
- Over time, as output increases, the firm may achieve economies of scale, further lowering average costs.
- Eventually, the industry becomes competitive without needing subsidies.
Q:
Compare why a government may protect its country’s industries from foreign competition. [6]
A:
- Infant Industries: Protection allows new firms to grow and achieve economies of scale before facing global competition.
- Strategic Industries: Protection ensures self-sufficiency in essential goods (e.g., food, defence) to avoid dependency on unstable foreign suppliers.
- Declining Industries: Protection prevents sudden job losses and social unrest in sectors that are no longer globally competitive.